Spank Industries Vomax 23AL - Review

by Rob Dunnet
Mar 28, 2010 at 18:50

I take pride in the fact that I can destroy bike parts and I am a little disappointed that these rims are still alive. After riding cross country and 1000 kilometers through Northern Thailand and Laos I put it in my mind that I would destroy them by riding with them on my freeride bike.

All details inside,

The Rims:

The Spank Ind. Vomax rims are made from Dynamal Alloy, which is used in airplanes and space ships. The rims are 32 hole, 26" presta and disc specific. They are available in black, white and silver.


A single rim weighs in at 335 grams, which is only 5 grams heavier than the listed weight of the DT Swiss XRC 300 Carbon Fibre rim.


To increase strength the rims are flash welded, combined with post weld cold work and artificial aging to make for a stronger welded rim.

The Test:

This being a cross country rim I started testing it by riding the local cross country loop. I was surprised by how stiff it felt. I was expected the wheel to flex while riding downhill or in corners, but it felt solid. I decided that it was time to push it a little bit more and started riding more all mountain style trails and was disappointed when I was unable to do any damage to the rim.



I then took them with me to Thailand and Laos. Riding an estimated 1000 kilometers over broken pavement and dirt mountain roads. 25 kilometer downhills over broken pavement and through pot holes the size of small cars day after day had no affect on the strength of these rims. I was disappointed again and decided that it was time to really test them.




When I got back to Taiwan, I put the wheels on my Banshee Wildcard. I would not classify it as a cross country bike. The first thing I noticed was the weight difference. All of my wheels are built with the same hubs and the rim weight difference was noticeable. I started out slowly by riding down our pump track line at a reasonable speed. After they did not fail I decided it was time to jump them. To my surprise and disappointment even jumping was not enough to cause failure.






I then decided I would spin a couple of 360's to see if they would survive a couple of bad landings. On several attempts I under spun and landed sideways, but again the wheels are still rolling straight.



I am sure that if I really put my mind to it I could destroy these wheels. A couple stair gaps, drops to flat or landing on a sharp edge would most likely cause some problems. But then I have to remember that these are 23 millimeter cross country rims that only weigh 335 grams.



Conclusion:

Light and strong are the two words I would use to describe these rims. They were a lot stronger than I expected. And Spank will probably advise against it, but I could imagine racing 4X on wheels built with these rims. I am going to continue riding with them on my freeride bike. I think they will eventually taco, but I thought that when there were on my cross country bike and at $90 USD per rim, they are priced among other rims in this class.

The only problems I have experienced with these rims are paint flaking around the nipple holes. I also broke a couple of poor quality tire levers getting the tire on and off the rim. In most cases I can roll a tire on and off with my hands. A quality tire lever or super man hands will solve this problem.

Keep Riding.

Rob Dunnet
Must Read This Week

35 Comments

  • + 4
flag seraph (Apr 8, 2010 at 1:23)
 Kind of a surprise product from Spank. Most of their parts up until now have been pretty heavy, strange to see them release a new contender in the lightweight XC/AM rim market.
  • + 3
flag home-team (Apr 8, 2010 at 1:38)
 they have shaved weight out of all of their products, they are using a new material in their rims, they do not have to use as much material to get the same strength. welcome to the new spank, strong and light with the same great looks.
  • - 3
flag cjmorton (Apr 8, 2010 at 2:42)
 i still will never buy spank ever again!
  • + 2
flag DH-Til-I-Die (Apr 8, 2010 at 2:49)
 Spank i find are relible.
  • + 0
flag cjmorton (Apr 8, 2010 at 2:51)
 i split my rims after 1 month and they were horrid to build.. mavics for the win
  • + 1
flag JonnyE (Apr 8, 2010 at 2:52)
 why not? whats wrong with spank?
  • - 1
flag cjmorton (Apr 8, 2010 at 2:53)
 where do i start haha
  • + 1
flag JonnyE (Apr 8, 2010 at 3:00)
 there are some nice stuff, only problem i had was that the lounge bars are hell for putting lock on grips on so i use slide ons instead.
  • + 4
flag OllyJ (Apr 8, 2010 at 3:32)
 I agree on the lounge bars and grips. WTF comes to mind, but the rest of their stuff is awesome, deberguknottignham you've obviously had a bad experience with their stuff, but that doesn't make it shit, I've cracked a mavic ex 721 rim, but that doesn't make mavic shit, its a one off, everything has its good and bad points, I'd give spank another go if I were you, and if it really doesn't hold up, either you're the next bender, or sorry to say but you have no finesse and style in your riding. just my 2c Wink
[Reply]
  • + 7
flag Infiltrator (Apr 8, 2010 at 0:19)
 always did like spank components
  • + 4
flag ktmpaul111 (Apr 8, 2010 at 4:55)
 I can't believe they held up...... stiff stuff
  • + 3
flag home-team (Apr 8, 2010 at 9:47)
 that makes you and me, i am amazed they are still rolling true
[Reply]
  • + 1
flag radatabs (Apr 8, 2010 at 5:14)
 iv been really impressed by how strong my subrosa rim has been hoever i managed to bend it using metal tyre levers to get my maxxis high roller 2.7 off and also all the paint has started to flake and just peeled off so now iv got a bit of silver and white rim but i reckon they will be okay aslong as you use plastic tyre levers
  • + 2
flag Gsnickets (Apr 8, 2010 at 6:12)
 metal levers, especially the big park ones, are a no no
  • + 1
flag phobospwns (Apr 8, 2010 at 6:35)
 might as well use a tire iron at that point.
  • + 1
flag morewhitenoise (Apr 8, 2010 at 9:33)
 who uses 2.7 tires!?
  • + 3
flag FregoS (Apr 8, 2010 at 11:01)
 radatabs uses 2.7 tires
[Reply]
  • + 1
flag rffr (Apr 8, 2010 at 15:59)
 ok, my question is... if they can produce an xc race rim that can take this abuse... then why the hell aren't they making dh rims? Smile

They would probably crush the market with them.
  • + 1
flag rffr (Apr 8, 2010 at 16:00)
 answered my own question. They do. LOl Smile) rock on
[Reply]
  • + 1
flag dutchforce (Apr 21, 2010 at 5:03)
 when I saw the roadtrip storys here on pinkbike I was thinking why do such a trip on a heavy rim.. I thought they would be like 550gram strong wide rims but now I see there accually super light xc rims Razz
[Reply]
  • + 1
flag PhoS (Apr 8, 2010 at 7:45)
 I bet those wheels can take a lot more abuse than this reviewer thinks. With some good spokes in place I wouldn't hesitate to DJ on these. Light wheels are amazing , I cant wait till tech makes them even lighter.
  • + 1
flag home-team (Apr 8, 2010 at 9:36)
 i agree with you, i am amazed with out much abuse they have taken, i think a rock garden, some drops to flat or stair gaps would do some damage, but why find out?
[Reply]
  • + 1
flag slamman (Jun 10, 2010 at 0:46)
 Spank rims are real bad at the joint, if they get that sorted and some eyelets then they'd be worth the money
  • + 1
flag home-team (Jun 10, 2010 at 0:53)
 i have not had any problems with them ... have you ridden their new stuff?
  • + 1
flag slamman (Jun 10, 2010 at 0:56)
 yes, I'm a wheel builder and have been for 20 plus years, they are damn strong and not that light, I'm talking all spank rims now, but they need a build quality check and eyelets and they would be one of the best aroud. saying all this i have not had one rim back, broken or bent so not all bad news
  • + 1
flag home-team (Jun 10, 2010 at 1:01)
 their newer rims have a lower listed weight then a lot of the competition. the new material they are using shaves weight but allows them to keep their strength. i was amazed with what these rims were able to take ... 335gram cross country wheels on my freeride bike and they still have not failed. i do agree with you about the eyelets ...
  • + 1
flag slamman (Jun 11, 2010 at 2:34)
 good can't wait to try the new versions then, did you build your own wheels? just wondered what the joint is like, hopefully a lot better. apologies for my spelling by the way, should read it before i post it. ha ha
  • + 1
flag home-team (Jun 11, 2010 at 2:39)
 i choose not to build my own wheels, i have not had any issues with the joints ...
[Reply]
  • + 1
flag MYZTICUSA (Apr 8, 2010 at 20:17)
 and yet i JUST got heavy MTX33's :/ lol
[Reply]
  • + 2
flag alexdjer93 (Apr 8, 2010 at 1:12)
 nice!
[Reply]
  • + 1
flag CHIPPER4X (Apr 8, 2010 at 12:36)
 what is the erd on these rims
[Reply]
  • + 1
flag ralbisurez (Apr 8, 2010 at 0:57)
 gangster!
[Reply]
  • + 0
flag brandonf (Apr 8, 2010 at 9:17)
 335 grams! I thought that that weight was reserved for xc racing rims!
  • + 2
flag home-team (Apr 8, 2010 at 9:35)
 they are xc race rims ...
  • + 1
flag brandonf (Apr 8, 2010 at 13:38)
 Ya but they seem to hold up to alot more, judging by this review.
[Reply]

Post a Comment



You must login to Pinkbike.
Don't have an account? Sign up

Join Pinkbike  Login
Copyright © 2000 - 2012. Pinkbike.com. All rights reserved.
dv43 0.044698